Nobody runs a trading education business, pays for ads, builds a platform, and staffs a team purely out of generosity. If something in this industry is advertised as free, the money to fund it is coming from somewhere — and in almost every case, that somewhere is a broker.

The three ways "free" gets funded

Most free trading education, signal groups, and "mentor" programs are funded through one of a small number of well-established arrangements with brokers:

  • CPA (cost-per-acquisition): the educator gets paid a fixed amount, often $200–$500, when someone they refer opens an account and meets a deposit/trading threshold.
  • Spread or commission markup: the broker widens the spread or commission slightly for referred clients, and shares that markup back with the educator on an ongoing basis for as long as the client trades.
  • Straight revenue share: a percentage of whatever the referred client generates in trading costs over their lifetime as a client.

These arrangements are called Introducing Broker (IB) or affiliate programs, and virtually every regulated broker runs one. They're a completely standard, legal part of how the industry distributes education and client acquisition costs.

What a CPA deal actually is, in plain terms

Since it's directly relevant to how we operate: MPC has a CPA arrangement with AvaTrade. When someone we refer opens an account, deposits, and trades, we're paid a fixed fee by AvaTrade. That's the same mechanism funding most of the "free" trading content you've seen anywhere else — we're just telling you it exists instead of pretending our free trial, Academy, and Coach access run on goodwill alone.

The existence of a broker relationship isn't the problem. The problem is when it's hidden, and when it starts dictating advice that isn't actually in your interest.

How to read any "free" offer correctly

The presence of a broker deal doesn't automatically make advice bad — plenty of genuinely useful education is funded this way, including a lot of what serious, regulated firms produce. What matters is whether the incentive shows up in the advice itself. A few concrete things worth checking:

  • Does the educator push you toward opening an account before you've actually learned anything useful?
  • Do they only ever recommend one specific broker, with no acknowledgment that alternatives exist?
  • Is position sizing and risk management taught at all, or does everything skip straight to "here's how to get started"?
  • Are they upfront that a broker relationship exists, if you ask directly?

Why we're telling you this

We could have written generic content about trading psychology and never mentioned any of this. We're choosing not to, because the entire premise of MPC is that this industry has a trust problem, and the fix isn't pretending incentives don't exist — it's naming them plainly and letting you judge the advice on its merits anyway. Our AvaTrade relationship funds free access to the Coach and Academy. That's the arrangement, stated directly.

Trade with a broker relationship we've actually disclosed

Free Academy and Coach access, funded transparently — start free.

Start Free Trial →